I’ve been reading Strength to Love, a collection of
Martin Luther King Jr’s sermons. It is a fantastic and challenging book. A book
to make a person uncomfortable, especially a white woman who has never had to
face many of these situations. I have read it before, but not from where we are
now. Now, I have a better understanding – not perfect by any means – of how it
feels to be discriminated against. Four years of the former guy and this last
year with Republicans echoing his nonsensical election fraud talking points
have me on edge. I’m sure many others as well. It has given me a new lens
through which to read Dr. King.
The sermon that is challenging me at the moment is on
Matthew 5:43-45, which is part of the Sermon on the Mount. Here is the text:
“You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your
neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you, love your enemies and pray for
those who persecute you, so that you may be children of your Father in heaven.”
He begins by discussing the how of loving or enemies. For Dr.
King, it starts with forgiveness. He has three points: forgiveness does not
mean walking away from the person, recognizing that all of us are a mixture of
good and bad motives, and ‘love’ means God’s love for us, agape, not
liking or approving of a person.
Dr. King then discusses the why. His three reasons
are that hate multiplies hate, adding to the chaos and confusion. This is the
source of his famous quote: Darkness cannot drive out darkness, only light can
do that. Hate cannot drive out hate, only love can do that. Second, hate scars
our souls and changes us. Not for the better. It victimizes both the hated and
the hater. Third, hate cannot transform an enemy into a friend. This is always
King’s goal, to keep the relationship open and transformative. Finally, we love
our enemies … so that we may be children of our father in heaven. If we want to
be children of our father in heaven, we must love our enemies. Simple as that.
Two points that Dr. King makes challenge me. He makes it clear that we cannot say ‘forgive
and forget’ or have nothing more to do with the person. Since his goal is to
keep relationships, neither of these are an option. As I read it, I kept coming
up with all kinds of scenarios in which this is not wise: abuse, domestic
violence, stalking, etc. As if King knew nothing about these.
Maybe the answer here is to see it from a different angle. Take
the former president; by all accounts he was severely abused (emotionally
rather than physically) as a child and young adult. His not dealing with the
aftermath in a healthy way led to who he is today. As a person who grew up in a
similar household, I can relate to that. I too was headed on a similar path. I probably
wasn’t as broken as he was and is. I still had a spark of desire to change. With
a lot of help and support from many people, I was able to work my way out of
the hell that I was living in. The former president has not been able to do
that.
I have no relationship with him, but I think the same
approach would work in people who may not be enemies but who are difficult to
deal with. Sometimes, that connection makes it possible to see them from a
different angle, and thus to start the process of forgiveness.
I feel the need to point out that although King wants to
keep the relationship open, there is no need to keep the relationship the same.
If I am married to an abuser, I don’t have to stay married to keep the
relationship open. Which makes me wonder how King defines an ongoing
relationship. What if the other person declines to talk with us? Does keeping
an open mind about the relationship, even if we are not speaking or interacting
regularly, satisfy his ideals? I like to think it does.
He ends this section with the thought that our ability to
forgive determines our ability to love. That is a challenge!
The second thing that challenges me is the assertion that
everyone has good and bad in them. Again, look at the former guy. I am hard put
to find anything good in him. Maybe he is too. On reflection, there’s no
requirement that we be able to see the good in others, or the bad for that
matter. I think I am prone to categorizing people as one or the other. It’s so
easy to do that, but it limits our vision. Taking it as true, seeing it from a
different angle, would inspire me to look for it. That too is a challenge.
Of course, the thing that will make it possible to rise to
these challenges is God’s love along with the love and support of others around
us. It would be difficult to see good in others if I didn’t already feel that
God sees good in me. I’m speaking for myself here, but maybe you can relate. It
would be difficult to stay in relationship with someone determined to hurt me
without such support. For me, it would be impossible.
But loving our neighbor asks us to go one further. It asks
us to see God’s love for our enemy, to see them from a different angle, God’s
Angle. If we can feel God’s love for ourselves, we theoretically can transfer
that love to our enemy. That is our goal. Why? So that we may be children of
our father and mother in heaven.
May you be challenged to see things from God’s angle today.
B